Any and every insurance scheme is racketeering, If you look to the uniform bonding code any law that is made compulsory is gambling/racketeering and any judge who “knowingly” enforces a racketeering scheme can be disbarred.
The key here is “knowingly” he can’t deny it once you forward that let him know that you know.
Anyway, I have never been formally charged with an insurance charge because of this fact in court.
Let’s go deeper what’s the first thing the government wants you to do when you buy a car? They want you to register it so now it technically and legally belongs to whoever issues you the registration papers. You can not even be “legally” obligated to pay insurance on a car that is not even yours, can you? That is fraud so they made compulsory insurance NO-FAULT at the same time because they had to.
Let’s say you do have an accident, you still have to pay the deductible which is usually the first $1000 on the damage so it’s not insurance at all, is it? They know that most fender benders don’t cost much more than that. then if you factor in the total amount of fraud you paid into, all the years that you have paid, your car would be paid off over and over again a thousand times already.
To go deeper into the scam of insurance. It is not an assurance of anything in fact it is the opposite. the prefix “IN” negates the word.
It makes the coherent ‘incoherent’ by design,
the tolerant intolerant to their wordplay like myself,
the sufficient insufficient because you pay out everything to this fraud and if you live this lie long enough it makes the sane insane.
DO YOU SEE WHAT IS HAPPENING HERE?
I have never used insurance and I use my car very carefully due to this fact, I see people flying around like maniacs every day because they have this false sense of security from their policy.